I suppose it is true of most writers, but I dream of what could be. I can't help it. I know the reality of things. I will likely work until a week after my death, at which time I will still be in debt up to my eyeballs, and my books will have sold 16 copies each. A tad bit pessimistic, I know, but I do still live in the real world.
Despite all of that, I can't help but daydream about how well my first book will do. Will it be a bestseller? Nah, but in my dreams it sure as heck is.
So, for the six of you who actually read this blog:
This round of edits is complete up through chapter 17(of 33), which puts me beyond the halfway mark. The feedback from my crew of editors has been priceless, and quite honestly, I can't wait to get going on the next round of edits. There has been some valuable information shared with me, as well as some praise on a few elements of the book that I wanted to come across just right.
I am still very excited with this endeavor. And last night I amplified that excitement ten-fold. I decided it was time to practice formatting the book for e-readers. I spent about an hour with the manuscript and the conversion software and loaded the book onto my wife's Kindle.
Pardon me a moment while I slip into textese.
OMFG!!
I can't explain the feeling I had when I saw my book title and C. Hollis Gunter as the author on the Kindle front screen. I still get all silly feeling when I think about it. As a matter of fact, my day dreaming just kicked it up a few notches. I will probably pass out when I see it listed on the Amazon website this fall.
Until then, I will keep on day dreaming.
Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Day Dreamer
Thursday, June 21, 2012
You Discovered What?
So, if you glance down the right hand side of the page you will see that I am reading a book about the Inca's. I enjoy reading histories about different cultures, how they lived, and how their lives may have differed from other cultures. But, what struck thought with this book was the ethnocentric view of how the Europeans "Discovered" areas of the world that other cultures already lived.
In 900 A.D there were cities in South America with greater populations than London. Kingdoms existed with much the same social stratification that could be found in Europe. So tell me Mr. Balboa; how is it again that you "discovered" an ocean that South American boats were already sailing on? And I'm thinking that there were some natives that could have disputed some of Columbus's "discoveries".
Can you imagine a Viking and a Spaniard standing on a beach arguing who found this land first, all the while a group of people who have lived there for years watch on?
I know, you are thinking that I am picking apart semantics. Nobody really "discovered" these geographical areas, they were just the first Europeans to see them. But not really.
The Europeans (much like today's Americans), felt they were far more superior than other cultures that may have existed, and from their conquests you'd find it hard to argue that from a military point of view. With that in mind, nobody of any importance had ever been to the America's, nor had they sailed the Pacific. Therefore, in their minds they truly believed that they had "discovered" a massive, populated, continent that was being cultivated and mined as they sailed across the Atlantic in search of slaves, gold, silver, and exotic goods.
And now, Biru is called Peru because the "superior culture" couldn't pronounce it right. The Cherokee, Mohicans, Seminole, and many other tribes are called Indians, because the "superior" culture thought they were somewhere else.
Semantics, I know. But, it is still ethnocentric.
In 900 A.D there were cities in South America with greater populations than London. Kingdoms existed with much the same social stratification that could be found in Europe. So tell me Mr. Balboa; how is it again that you "discovered" an ocean that South American boats were already sailing on? And I'm thinking that there were some natives that could have disputed some of Columbus's "discoveries".
Can you imagine a Viking and a Spaniard standing on a beach arguing who found this land first, all the while a group of people who have lived there for years watch on?
I know, you are thinking that I am picking apart semantics. Nobody really "discovered" these geographical areas, they were just the first Europeans to see them. But not really.
The Europeans (much like today's Americans), felt they were far more superior than other cultures that may have existed, and from their conquests you'd find it hard to argue that from a military point of view. With that in mind, nobody of any importance had ever been to the America's, nor had they sailed the Pacific. Therefore, in their minds they truly believed that they had "discovered" a massive, populated, continent that was being cultivated and mined as they sailed across the Atlantic in search of slaves, gold, silver, and exotic goods.
And now, Biru is called Peru because the "superior culture" couldn't pronounce it right. The Cherokee, Mohicans, Seminole, and many other tribes are called Indians, because the "superior" culture thought they were somewhere else.
Semantics, I know. But, it is still ethnocentric.
Friday, June 15, 2012
Don't Make It Sunday
Despite what some literary snobs would have you believe, even us genre authors have something to say with our writings. We also fall into the same pitfall; the sermon.
Terry Goodkind is the author that comes to mind when I think of preaching your beliefs in your novels. Goodkind, quite often, went overboard with the use of his character, Richard, to tell the reader all about organized religion. These sermons were intrusions into an otherwise engaging story. Whether or not you agreed with his viewpoint, you were taken away from his world. The character was no longer speaking, the author's voice came through loud and clear.
Annoying. Goodkind actually made several good points while up on his soapbox, but it did absolutely nothing for the story. Nothing. Nada. Zip. He wasted my time and several trees to force his viewpoint down my throat. I can tell you that, no matter how much I loved his world and story, he will never waste my time again.
And I did the same thing.
I have a lot to say about a lot of things, but this book uses slavery as a tool to show how we like to hold on to wrongs done to us in the past and use them as an excuse for the wrongs we do to others in the present. It's an endless cycle. Culture blue was wronged by culture red. They escaped the oppression and punished culture yellow and culture red, because yellow likes red. As time goes by, yellow overcomes and punishes blue and they're also angry with red because they did nothing when blue were punks. And on and on and on. Need an example? Read a little about the centuries old riff between Christianity and Islam. Don't forget to toss Judaism into the mix.
There I go again. At least it's not the book.
I found a passage in Chapter Fourteen, while doing this round of pencil edits, where a character says and thinks things that were totally in my voice. I am so glad that I caught it, but it just shows me that as much as I hate something, I can fall into the same trap. It was an accident on my part, and I am sure that other well-meaning author's have had the same slip up and it made it into print.
What we have to remember when we write, as genre authors, the reader is there to escape the world. You can say what you need to say without taking them out of your world. You have to remember that the story is first; you have an entire novel (or series) to sprinkle in a bit of your beliefs. Don't do it in a paragraph, page, or chapter long sermon.
Don't make it Sunday.
Terry Goodkind is the author that comes to mind when I think of preaching your beliefs in your novels. Goodkind, quite often, went overboard with the use of his character, Richard, to tell the reader all about organized religion. These sermons were intrusions into an otherwise engaging story. Whether or not you agreed with his viewpoint, you were taken away from his world. The character was no longer speaking, the author's voice came through loud and clear.
Annoying. Goodkind actually made several good points while up on his soapbox, but it did absolutely nothing for the story. Nothing. Nada. Zip. He wasted my time and several trees to force his viewpoint down my throat. I can tell you that, no matter how much I loved his world and story, he will never waste my time again.
And I did the same thing.
I have a lot to say about a lot of things, but this book uses slavery as a tool to show how we like to hold on to wrongs done to us in the past and use them as an excuse for the wrongs we do to others in the present. It's an endless cycle. Culture blue was wronged by culture red. They escaped the oppression and punished culture yellow and culture red, because yellow likes red. As time goes by, yellow overcomes and punishes blue and they're also angry with red because they did nothing when blue were punks. And on and on and on. Need an example? Read a little about the centuries old riff between Christianity and Islam. Don't forget to toss Judaism into the mix.
There I go again. At least it's not the book.
I found a passage in Chapter Fourteen, while doing this round of pencil edits, where a character says and thinks things that were totally in my voice. I am so glad that I caught it, but it just shows me that as much as I hate something, I can fall into the same trap. It was an accident on my part, and I am sure that other well-meaning author's have had the same slip up and it made it into print.
What we have to remember when we write, as genre authors, the reader is there to escape the world. You can say what you need to say without taking them out of your world. You have to remember that the story is first; you have an entire novel (or series) to sprinkle in a bit of your beliefs. Don't do it in a paragraph, page, or chapter long sermon.
Don't make it Sunday.
Monday, June 4, 2012
Titles, Working Titles, Sub Titles, Oy
Finished up my edits to Chapters Six and Seven and got them ready for the editors. I need to string a few weeks of three chapters together to get on track for a September release.
When I began this project eons ago, I saved my word document using a working title type name, Drums. I think I've mentioned this, but just in case I will throw it out there again. It took most of the book before I came up with an actual title for the novel. I love the name. I even Googled it to see if the title already existed and found it to be (hopefully) unique.
Now that I have found a way to create the story in a manner that it was intended, I have to come up with a name for the series. The Chronicles of..., The ... Trilogy (mine probably won't be a trilogy), etc. etc. This is actually just as difficult as the book title was. At the moment, I am leaning towards a sub title that reflects the working title. Of course, I want to be careful that the sub title will apply to the rest of the series as well.
When I began this project eons ago, I saved my word document using a working title type name, Drums. I think I've mentioned this, but just in case I will throw it out there again. It took most of the book before I came up with an actual title for the novel. I love the name. I even Googled it to see if the title already existed and found it to be (hopefully) unique.
Now that I have found a way to create the story in a manner that it was intended, I have to come up with a name for the series. The Chronicles of..., The ... Trilogy (mine probably won't be a trilogy), etc. etc. This is actually just as difficult as the book title was. At the moment, I am leaning towards a sub title that reflects the working title. Of course, I want to be careful that the sub title will apply to the rest of the series as well.
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
Declaration of Independence
In the not so distant past, self publishing was the kiss of death. You would never reach a large audience, and the major publishing houses would shun you once you published your work. That was the past.
I have done a substantial amount of research in recent weeks and found the e-publishing revolution in full swing. Will I achieve such heights as King, Grisham, Martin, and others? Not likely. Will someone other than myself and my three editors read my work. Heck yes.
Which has been my goal from the start.
I have a story that is screaming to be heard. At no cost to me, I can throw it out there so people can read it. Time will tell if it is worthy of reading. Don't get me wrong, I would love to sell millions, but that is a dream at the back of my skull being held down by the strong hairy arm of reality. What I think of my writing is irrelevant. What you think is key. I can only hope that you take as much joy in reading the story, as I took in writing.
Over the next three months, I will be using this blog, Facebook, and Twitter, to introduce the World of Nilrus. Call it a miniature marketing campaign, which at this point will only be seen by friends and family (yes, I need to work on that too). I won't be doing this on my own. Teri, Lucky, and Athena are helping me on this journey (in some cases, pushing); without them this would not be happening. It is my hope to show you the characters and the world they live in and maybe even strike that desire for you to read their story.
At the end of these three months, I will be an independent author. The novel will be available at most of the e-book venues like Amazon. You will be able to read my book on your Nook, Kindle, or one of the other e-readers available. The ultimate judgement of success or failure will lie in the hands of the reader.
I have done a substantial amount of research in recent weeks and found the e-publishing revolution in full swing. Will I achieve such heights as King, Grisham, Martin, and others? Not likely. Will someone other than myself and my three editors read my work. Heck yes.
Which has been my goal from the start.
I have a story that is screaming to be heard. At no cost to me, I can throw it out there so people can read it. Time will tell if it is worthy of reading. Don't get me wrong, I would love to sell millions, but that is a dream at the back of my skull being held down by the strong hairy arm of reality. What I think of my writing is irrelevant. What you think is key. I can only hope that you take as much joy in reading the story, as I took in writing.
Over the next three months, I will be using this blog, Facebook, and Twitter, to introduce the World of Nilrus. Call it a miniature marketing campaign, which at this point will only be seen by friends and family (yes, I need to work on that too). I won't be doing this on my own. Teri, Lucky, and Athena are helping me on this journey (in some cases, pushing); without them this would not be happening. It is my hope to show you the characters and the world they live in and maybe even strike that desire for you to read their story.
At the end of these three months, I will be an independent author. The novel will be available at most of the e-book venues like Amazon. You will be able to read my book on your Nook, Kindle, or one of the other e-readers available. The ultimate judgement of success or failure will lie in the hands of the reader.
Monday, May 21, 2012
The Growth of Independence
Jump into the way-back machine, okay, maybe not so way-back.
Books in electronic format have been around for a bit, but really, the Kindle really brought the written word into the modern age. Resistance was there, and I was one of them. I like the feel, the smell, the look of a printed book in my hand. Not to mention the aesthetics of a physical representation of my purchase. Regardless of my resistance, e-readers are everywhere, and more and more people are embracing this technology on a daily basis. The traditional publishing houses still resist.
When Amazon brought us the Kindle, they warned that those $5 books wouldn't last; the publisher's were already resisting then. Today, when you shop for a new e-book on Amazon, you will see one line; "the price was set by the publisher". Is this their way of saying "we tried to tell them it was too much"?
Without getting into the whole argument about why, or whether the price is justified, let me just say that in most cases the paperback is cheaper than the electronic version.
But, this is a good thing. Because of the arrogance of the Big 6, readers have found some quality independent authors. If you scan some of Kindle's top selling lists, you will see they are skewed more toward the indie's. Writers are finding out that they can do just as well, and in some cases better, on their own as if they had signed a big contract .
How long will this go on? Seems to me that is up to the big publishing houses. As long as they try to sell their books at the prices they are trying to sell them at now, readers will gravitate towards the independents.
Personally, I think the big houses should charge more.
Books in electronic format have been around for a bit, but really, the Kindle really brought the written word into the modern age. Resistance was there, and I was one of them. I like the feel, the smell, the look of a printed book in my hand. Not to mention the aesthetics of a physical representation of my purchase. Regardless of my resistance, e-readers are everywhere, and more and more people are embracing this technology on a daily basis. The traditional publishing houses still resist.
When Amazon brought us the Kindle, they warned that those $5 books wouldn't last; the publisher's were already resisting then. Today, when you shop for a new e-book on Amazon, you will see one line; "the price was set by the publisher". Is this their way of saying "we tried to tell them it was too much"?
Without getting into the whole argument about why, or whether the price is justified, let me just say that in most cases the paperback is cheaper than the electronic version.
But, this is a good thing. Because of the arrogance of the Big 6, readers have found some quality independent authors. If you scan some of Kindle's top selling lists, you will see they are skewed more toward the indie's. Writers are finding out that they can do just as well, and in some cases better, on their own as if they had signed a big contract .
How long will this go on? Seems to me that is up to the big publishing houses. As long as they try to sell their books at the prices they are trying to sell them at now, readers will gravitate towards the independents.
Personally, I think the big houses should charge more.
Friday, May 18, 2012
I Have A ... Goal
For many years I have had a story in my head, at some point the howling of the characters forced my hand and I began to put this story on the page. It is a big story; maybe not as big as The Wheel of Time series, and probably not as short as the fantasy standard trilogy. Regardless, that first book was not a stand alone story, no matter how hard I tried to make it so.
And that is where this new journey began. You see, getting Book One of many published through traditional means is improbable, at best, for an unpublished writer. I didn't find this out until Book One had been through a couple of edits. I was discouraged when this knowledge came to light, but I set aside that passion and began a new, stand alone, book. Unfortunately, my heart was still with the characters and story line of Book One, which left the new project hollow and, at times, stagnant.
During one of these periods of no writing, I did a lot of reading. I sought out newer fantasy novels by authors that I was not familiar with. I wanted to see what was selling in the market. I wanted to see if some of my ideas could sell. This led me to the inspiration behind my change of path; David Dalglish.
David is an independent author, as in not tied to one of the big publishing houses. And from what I can tell, he has been quite successful. His books are well done and I highly recommend you read them. They do have a few (very few really) editing issues, mispelled words, wrong words, etc. and a handful of phrases that just don't fit in a fantasy setting, but altogether well written.
I bring up the editing and phrases, not to bash Mr. Dalglish, but to bring up a point. This was something that I feared with my own writing. How could I publish something that had not been through the "process"; the process where an agent sends the manuscript back to me several times, and then an editor at the publisher takes a few pokes at it? That process refines a somewhat rough work and results in the printed book that you purchase at the store. David has shown me that it doesn't have to be perfect (or near perfect) to sell.
With all that rambling, I guess the bottom line is that David Dalglish has inspired me to pursue the once forbidden path of self-publishing. I have imposed a deadline on myself and I have thirty-three chapters to edit, three of which will be a complete re-write.
My goal? Publish my book in September of this year. My dream? That people enjoy it.
And that is where this new journey began. You see, getting Book One of many published through traditional means is improbable, at best, for an unpublished writer. I didn't find this out until Book One had been through a couple of edits. I was discouraged when this knowledge came to light, but I set aside that passion and began a new, stand alone, book. Unfortunately, my heart was still with the characters and story line of Book One, which left the new project hollow and, at times, stagnant.
During one of these periods of no writing, I did a lot of reading. I sought out newer fantasy novels by authors that I was not familiar with. I wanted to see what was selling in the market. I wanted to see if some of my ideas could sell. This led me to the inspiration behind my change of path; David Dalglish.
David is an independent author, as in not tied to one of the big publishing houses. And from what I can tell, he has been quite successful. His books are well done and I highly recommend you read them. They do have a few (very few really) editing issues, mispelled words, wrong words, etc. and a handful of phrases that just don't fit in a fantasy setting, but altogether well written.
I bring up the editing and phrases, not to bash Mr. Dalglish, but to bring up a point. This was something that I feared with my own writing. How could I publish something that had not been through the "process"; the process where an agent sends the manuscript back to me several times, and then an editor at the publisher takes a few pokes at it? That process refines a somewhat rough work and results in the printed book that you purchase at the store. David has shown me that it doesn't have to be perfect (or near perfect) to sell.
With all that rambling, I guess the bottom line is that David Dalglish has inspired me to pursue the once forbidden path of self-publishing. I have imposed a deadline on myself and I have thirty-three chapters to edit, three of which will be a complete re-write.
My goal? Publish my book in September of this year. My dream? That people enjoy it.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)